April 2006
Vol. 5 #1

Subscribe to SuperTECH NEWS

SuperTECH NEWS is the bi-monthly newsletter of the BLE GROUP, which provides small- and medium-size school systems with supplementary technology management to produce high-quality educational results and efficient management.

The purpose of SuperTECH News is to provide education decision makers with concise information that allows them to make informed technology decisions to impact instruction, management and communication. This is information you can use on Monday morning.

Editor, Susan DeMark
Web Design, Charlene Polanosky
Publisher, Eliot Levinson

 

Our April issue theme is 1 to 1 computing in K-12. Choose from the following articles:

 

The BLE Group and Its Services: The BLE Group is comprised of 50 CIOs, superintendents, and curriculum directors of school systems, intermediate units and state education departments who are knowledgeable about and dedicated to using technology to improve K-12 instruction and management. The BLE Group provides services to schools to  plan and manage technology use to improve results and make school operations more efficient. Sound bite
Theme of the Month— In this month’s newsletter, we check out 1 to 1 computing in K-12 schools nationwide. There has been a huge growth spurt in the number of these programs, and they are changing. We take you through the current state of 1 to 1 and how it’s evolving into a student-centric set of devices for distinct purposes – and we tell you what you need to consider.
Products SuperTECH News examines a selection of key companies, looking at how each one defines 1 to 1 computing and how the company tailors its services and products for these initiatives.
Best Practices—Lessons learned from two examples of 1 to 1 computing: Virginia’s Henrico County Public Schools, one of the pioneers of 1 to 1, is in the fifth year of a program that provides a laptop to every middle school and high school student and teacher. Guernsey-Sunrise Schools in Wyoming gets to 1 to 1 through the use of a wide array of computing devices and connection setups, including desktops, laptops, handhelds, and thin clients.
Conferences—Check out the relevant conferences coming in the next several months.

We want to hear from you. What do you agree and disagree with on this issue (we will post comments from readers in the next issue). Please write us at eliot@blegroup.com.

DID YOU MISS AN ISSUE?
You can read past issues of SuperTECH NEWS relating to NCLB online:

  • October 2005 - Focus: Open Source
  • May 2005 - Focus: Networking
  • January 2005 - Focus: Professional Development
  • October 2004 - Focus: Technology-based Early Reading Progams
  • June 2004 - Focus: The Education Killer App
  • March 2004 - Focus: Network and data security
  • November 2003 - Focus: Handheld computers and software applications for these devices
  • May 2003 - Focus: Data Warehousing and Data Management Solutions
  • February 2003 - Focus: Web-based Assessment Products for High-Stakes Tests
  • December 2002 - Focus: Student Information Systems
  • August 2002 - Focus: Purchasing Hardware 2002
  • June 2002 - Focus: Web-based Applications for Early Reading
  • May 2002 - Focus: Web-based Professional Development
  • March 2002 - Focus: Technology of Accountability

 

BLE GROUP: WHO WE ARE AND STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES FOR SCHOOLS

The BLE Group is comprised of 50 CIOs, superintendents, and curriculum directors of school systems, intermediate units and state education departments who are knowledgeable about and dedicated to using technology to improve K-12 instruction and management. The BLE Group provides services to schools to plan and manage technology use to improve results and make school operations more efficient. The services are:

  • Super TECH NEWS: A free, web-based newsletter to provide superintendents and other senior non-technical decision makers with current, easy-to-understand information to guide technology decisions. The BLE Group provides Supertechnews as a service to educators, as there is a need for a neutral source of information on educational technology and best practices. Super Technews is published quarterly. Each issue has a theme that is important to decision makers, such as assessment, educational portals, 1 to 1 computing and professional development.  
  • Technology/Audit Plans: The audit plan provides a school system with a three to five year implantation plan for technology to address strategic instruction and management goals. The process starts with an assessment of how technology is currently used and moves to a plan that links technology to the district’s strategic instructional and management objectives. The audit/plan is divided into four main areas: instruction, management systems, infrastructure and technology organization. Each comes with findings and recommendations. There are also sections on budget and implementation. Technology Audit/Plans meet the requirements of No Child Left Behind and are often used by new superintendents, school boards and CIOS to get a picture of how technology should be used. There are three levels of Technology/Audit/plans, varying in depth and detail from a short site visit and report to a large team endeavor with a thorough report.
  • Balanced Score Card Method for Strategic Planning and Management: Many school systems have difficulty in implementing their strategic plan to achieve outcomes, such as instructional improvement and in managing projects that go across departments. The balanced score card is a methodology developed in the private sector to address strategic planning and management and adopted by the BLE Group. It begins by working backwards from identified outcomes and strategic goals. It then defines the stakeholders, metrics and benchmarks to address all the critical activities and appoint project owners and managers to oversee a project. The balanced score card approach to strategic planning and management is ideal for schools as it functions well across departments and establishes an ongoing review and management process. The BLE Group has experienced facilitators who provide this service for school systems and develop the management capacity in the district to manage the process themselves.
  • CIO and Project Management Services: School districts often lack skilled, experienced project managers to implement major systems, such as finance, student information and data warehouse systems.They also frequently need the services of someone who can help them plan and implement strategic technology. The BLE Group has seven experienced CIOs who are able to project manage large projects for school systems.
  • Implementation Support - The biggest problem schools have is getting technology used effectively. Fifty-five percent of the software purchased is never used. The BLE Group implementation service consists of providing technical assistance for the district to do the pilot project management, such as for instructional management and ERP systems assessment. The outcomes include a project plan for the main implementation, technical and organizational project management, a successful pilot project and improved management capacity for the district in the implementation of strategic technology systems.
  • NCLB Management Support for Smaller School Systems (aka CIO time- share services CIO)This service allows smaller districts to retain the services of a strategically oriented experienced CIO on a part-time basis at a reasonable cost to provide the technology expertise they need but normally cannot afford.  The BLE Group is experienced in improving the quality of education in small and rural school systems. Accountability and technology are inseparable; you cannot do NCLB without it. The BLE Group's NCLB management and support service provides small school systems and consortiums of smaller schools with a part-time CIO who will work as part of the school’s management team. The service consists of:
      • a technology/audit plan
      • RFPs for critical systems
      • E-rate oversight
      • Implementation management
  • E-rate Services- E-rate is arcane and hard to do. Many school systems do not get the funding they deserve and get bogged down in the E-rate application process.  The BLE Group has staff and strategic partners who assist districts in doing their E-rate applications including planning, design and dealing with all phases of contracting and appeals.

BLE Group People

Eliot Levinson is the founder of the BLE Group. Levinson launched the BLE Group (www.blegroup.com) in 1998 to help schools implement technology for better results. With on-the-ground experience, Levinson felt there was a need for professional services from a group of top notch educators who understood technology and could address the unique needs of K-12 schools.

Levinson is known globally for his work in implementation of technology for accountability and his knowledge of the education technology industry. His background integrates education and technology. His experience in education includes posts as a teacher in California and Pennsylvania, a middle school principal in Massachusetts, and an assistant to the chancellor of schools in New York City. His technology and research background ranges from having worked as a management scientist at the Rand Corporation and directing a research program on the organizational impact of technology at MIT's Sloan School of Management to being the co-founder of a web-based instruction company.

Levinson works as a strategic technology advisor to school systems of all sizes and state departments of education. He also provides several educational-technology firms with strategic planning, focus groups and implementation support. He speaks frequently on topics of education policy, technology, leadership, and school management and writes regularly for the education press.

The BLE Group's core team includes:

  • Eliot Levinson-CEO, BLE Group
  • Rick Rozzelle-Former CIO, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, North Carolina, Interim CIO, Tennessee department of Education, Director North Carolina Data management consortium.
  • Charles Garten-Former CIO,  Poway Unified School District, California
  • Kenneth Eastwood-Superintendent, Middletown, New York
  • Don Hall- Executive Director of technology, Kent Washington
  • Patrick Kelly- Former CIO, Frederick County Maryland
  • John Richards- Former CEO; Turner Education, BBN education, and the Jason Foundation
  • Kathleen Florio- Education journalist
  • Susan DeMark- Editor Supertechnews

NOTE: To inquire about BLE Group services, check out our Web site at www.blegroup.com or call 202.281.1763

Back to top Back to top

THEME: 1 to 1 Computing

The 1 to 1 movement – initiatives across the country to put a mobile computing device into the hands of each student – is moving into late adolescence. What does this mean? After well more than a decade since the first experiments and following important large-scale adoptions like Maine and Henrico County, Va., there is a huge growth spurt in such initiatives, they’re maturing, and they’re smarter in some ways and not so much in others. The next 1-2 years will see a paradigm shift to a much more sophisticated understanding of 1 to 1.

Why is 1 to 1 important? The research is clear: routine access to technology can increase student learning and achievement.

Currently, many schools are still close to the notion of 1 to 1 as putting a laptop PC in the hands of every pupil, with a focus on the device first.  This is putting the cart before the horse. In this newsletter, we will look at the current state of 1 to 1 and how it’s evolving into a student-centric set of devices for distinct purposes -- and we’ll tell you what you need to consider.

What is the current state of 1 to 1?

  • 1 to 1 programs are growing at a very rapid rate. About 25 percent of the country’s largest 2,500 school districts are embarking on 1 to 1 initiatives, according to preliminary data from a report on digital schools by the Hayes Connection and the Greaves Group, who are conducting a survey on 1 to 1 implementations.  This is up from the single digits just two to three years ago.
  • Schools are implementing 1 to 1 programs for varying reasons, including seeking to bolster student achievement; providing technological literacy; ensuring all students have access to technology; and enhancing the teaching and learning process.
  • Research so far shows a positive impact of 1 to 1 programs. Students in these programs:
    • are writing more and producing a higher quality of writing;
    • have earned higher test scores and grades for writing, English-language arts, and mathematics;
    • are spending more time in collaborative work;
    • are demonstrating increased critical and creative thinking;
    • are spending more time in homework when this work is done on a computer.
  • The types of 1 to 1 programs vary widely – schools are undertaking such initiatives in many different ways and with an array of devices. Tom Greaves, chairman of the Greaves Group, notes, “It’s all over the board, in terms of how schools are implementing (1 to 1).”  Some schools call it 1 to 1 when students check out a laptop from a mobile cart in a classroom and use it during the school day. For others, 1 to 1 means students having a mobile wireless computing device for their use 24/7, with technology integrated into every phase of learning.
  • The mix of devices included in 1 to 1 ranges from desktops and laptops to thin clients, handhelds, and smart phones. Handhelds have become much more viable for school use. And thin clients – “slimmed down” machines with no hard drive or local storage – are helping schools cope with tight budgets.

How is 1 to 1 evolving, and where will it go in the next 1 to 3 years?

  • 1 to 1 computing is moving beyond a straight technology definition to what is needed to transform the teaching and learning process. It begins with a focus on educational outcomes first. The devices are only one element of a 1 to 1 program, along with instructional content, the applications, the network infrastructure, ongoing and significant professional development, classroom management, security, integration strategies, and building community support.
  • Look for much more student-friendly devices. The current devices still have limitations for widespread school use – due to expense, battery life concerns, vulnerability to breaking, and other issues – and an intense effort is underway to get manufacturers to create better devices for K-12 market. Vendors are now more convinced of the payoff for them.  Expect to see this break open within the next 1-2 years with even better education- and student-appropriate wireless computing devices.

The nonprofit Project Inkwell, for example, is seeking to create a set of detailed functional standards for a school- and student-ready personal-computing device. Such a device would have the battery life, portability, screen size, ruggedness, affordable price, appropriate tools and apps, etc. to advance 1 to 1.

For one possibility of where the market is heading, check out the Fourier Systems Nova 5000, a device that attempts to fill in the gap between handheld devices and laptops with a large 7.5-inch color screen, ruggedness, good battery life, and a patented data-logging functionality geared to math and science.

  • 1 to 1 programs that show the most promise and achieve positive results start with establishing a clear vision aligned with educational goals and measurable outcomes. This is why people are paying more attention to the software, applications, infrastructure, content, the implementation process, and training. Schools are coming to understand that they need a range of services to implement and sustain 1 on 1, and companies are delivering more of these services, such as back-end portals, ongoing training, and project management. These services are worth your consideration.
  • Once a critical mass is reached of schools that have 1 to 1 learning, and students with anytime, anywhere access to technology, the next leaps forward will come. We are not here today. But once computing becomes ubiquitous and infusing every part of learning, the major content producers will create much more digital content for it.

Lastly, as a superintendent or CIO, here is what you need to think about for 1 to 1:

  1. Think about what access students need to network-based applications, what they need it for, and when they need it. This should drive how you think about devices and the goals of having 1 to 1 computing. This is not about hardware, and it’s not about keeping up with the district next door – it is about access and instruction. It is about the entire life cycle of supporting such access, and the applications and infrastructure to do it.
  2. Educational applications are moving to the Web; 1 to 1 computing means giving students access to instructional use 24/7. It both personalizes instruction and the extension of the school day. High-tech tools placed in the hands of students on a 24/7 basis are extending their learning and thinking processes. And, importantly, 1 to 1 computing can be built gradually and does not have to be an immediate, large program of devices.
  3. 1 to 1 computing does not have to mean laptops only. Laptops are not a one-machine-fits-all solution to students having 24/7 access to instruction and educational technology. In all likelihood – and especially with improving technologies – this means using a variety of devices and applications.
  4. What is the bang for the buck? What is your total cost of ownership going to be? And, are there times that a thin client or handheld can give you the same functionality at a lower initial cost with less breakage and support? These are issues that should be considered at the same time you’re determining the instructional need.

The next 1 to 5 years will see dramatic shifts. We’re looking at the underlying issues to push the conversation beyond the traditional 1 to 1 conception of a laptop in every hand. Now that we’ve established the groundwork, let’s take a look at Products and Solutions; a Device Chart that compares functionality, features, and possible negatives; and Best Practices examples of two school districts doing 1 to 1.

Back to top Back to top

New Products & Services

PRODUCTS AND SOLUTIONS:

Note: The BLE Group does not endorse any of the examples listed below. These products and services were chosen to give a representative sample of what is out there in open source technologies and related companies.

Many companies are offering devices and solutions for 1 to 1 initiatives in K-12 schools. In order to help our audience distinguish what is offered in the market, we decided to examine a selection of key companies and look at how each one defines 1 to 1 computing and tailors its offerings. We focus on the following companies:

IBM
http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/education/index.jsp

IBM is one of the companies defining 1 to 1 not as simply a set of devices. Rather, it focuses on both a mix of devices and a set of services and core elements that, when combined, enable school districts to change teaching and learning in a thorough manner to capitalize on technology and improve student achievement.

With IBM’s sale of its personal-computer hardware business to Lenovo, it’s concentrating much more on services in K-12 schools and other markets. With 1 to 1 computing, the company focuses on what schools need from “cradle to grave” in the process in order to implement such an initiative successfully – including instructional content, technology-integration strategies, professional development, a solid network infrastructure, concrete goals, and benchmarks through which progress against those goals can be measured.

IBM has four core elements to its 1 to 1 approach:

  • Providing access to multiple devices (e.g. handheld devices, laptops, thin clients) and to a system that allows flexibility to work with various devices as well as operating systems (e.g. Linux), for more affordable 1 to 1 opportunities;
  • Implementing life-cycle services that include infrastructure planning, academic and business goals, procurement, system integration, implementing digital content, professional development, help desk support, and maintenance;
  • Integrating appropriate application solutions – human resources, payroll, test scores, and other digital content – to address the needs of students, teachers, and administrators;
  • Operating an education portal back-end to store all of the applications and work in which a district’s teachers, students, administrators, and all stakeholders are engaged.

The education portal is a critical component of a 1 to 1 initiative, because it can streamline administrative tasks and information, and increase productivity. The portal is a role-based back end that displays information specific to that user; a parent’s site will be different than a student’s site and than a teacher’s site.

Ultimately, the goal is for each stakeholder in a school system to have access that would be much like the corporate portal – a secure, on-demand workplace in which a student, parent, teacher, or administrator can get everything he or she needs though his or her particular access point.

One example of IBM’s approach: The company completed a strategic implementation plan with the Whitfield School, a private middle and high school in St. Louis, Mo. IBM worked with Whitfield School administrators to create a three- to five-year implementation effort on how best to integrate laptops into teaching and learning. The company also aided Whitfield in integrating an open source model that would lower software and hardware maintenance costs. As part of the effort, IBM connects school leaders to a network of educators from around the country who have firsthand experience in executing 1 to 1 initiatives. 

Apple
http://www.apple.com/education/k12/onetoone/

Apple looks at 1 to 1 as an environment in which there is a laptop for every student and teacher. The company calls iBook laptops the computer of choice in a current model 1 to 1 program. In a 1 to 1 learning environment, students have access to a wireless laptop to use at school and at home. Beyond the device, however, Apple defines 1 to 1 as en entire environment in which technology is not solely a tool but is a pervasive force throughout teaching and learning.

This environment is about developing a whole system that includes wireless connectivity and mobility; a learning infrastructure that enables communication and collaboration, content creation, and ongoing assessment; and an integrated suite of software for creating presentations, movies, and lessons that include video, photos, animation, sound, and music. In Apple’s approach, the classroom needs to replicate the technology students experience around them elsewhere, and to leverage the technology awareness that they have grown up with.

Apple works with school districts, both large and small, to design the components that will support a 1 to 1 environment, including plans for building infrastructure; staffing; and intense onsite professional development incorporating in-class training.There are several other important facets of 1 to 1 adoption, according to Apple, such as:

  • Reliability – 1 to 1 doesn’t happen when there is down time
  • Community buy-in – strategies for engaging the community to support 1 to 1 endeavors are very important to a program’s success
  • Funding – the funding for a 1 to 1 program must be ongoing, and Apple’s premise is that the teaching and learning budget must be reconstructed in order to support the use of pervasive technology on a 1 to 1 basis

To ensure a successful 1 to 1 implementation, Apple Education Professional Services provides a complete solution comprised of project management, integration services, professional development, and setup services. For project management, Apple’s team can coordinate and manage the entire deployment process. Apple’s Professional Development works with schools to effectively transform learning through technology. It features onsite workshops to help teachers make the most of 1 to 1 learning.

Apple acknowledges that a 1 to 1 approach and a “digital school” that supports ubiquitous computing are ambitious objectives – a “vision on the hill,” as Karen Cator, head of education strategy, calls it. Therefore, the company offers a number of incremental solutions that help schools begin on the road toward 1 to 1 learning, such as the Apple Wireless Mobile Lab.

ClassLink
http://www.classlink2000.com/home.shtml

ClassLink helps schools get to 1 to 1 through a thin-client program-management application that enables schools to deploy their tailored curriculum software across multiple computers with minimal computing power. The company’s solution is a customizable computing environment that connects students, teachers, administrative staff, and parents through a single virtual desktop interface. Rather than simply continue to purchase new devices to expand access, a number of school districts have turned to ClassLink as a solution that allows anytime, anywhere access to applications and work.

ClassLink offers what it calls a Universal Learning Environment in which students, teachers, and staff are connected to the applications and data they need and use. It will work on nearly any computer (PC or Mac-based, desktop or laptop, wired or wireless, new or old). Applications are loaded and maintained at a central server. With the thin-client computing, students can log onto the ClassLink system from any device onto the network and access the virtual desktop.

This environment is facilitated and supported by ClassLink’s Universal Learning Suite, comprised of three modules:

  • The ClassLink Information Console is a flexible, scalable server-based platform through which school IT personnel manage the network.
  • OnTrack is a tool that allows schools to track teaching and learning that identifies and collects students’ records of skills, proficiencies, and achievement tied to state and national standards and rubrics. It also enables automated updates and distribution of district lesson curriculum, lesson plans, and tracking rubrics.
  • LaunchPad is the centralized access point to the learning environment, which can be individually customized. It provides anywhere, anytime access for students and staff at school, community, and home through logons. It also facilitates real-time virtual conferencing.  

ClassLink doesn’t envision its product and services as the be-all, end-all solution to student computing and a district’s instructional technology access. The company sees it as part of a hybrid approach that can use server-centric computing for legacy computers, in combination with newer computers on the network that are configured to be able to access to the central network and data.

Dell
http://www.dell4k12.com/resource_detail.php?ri=66

For 1 to 1 computing, Dell provides built-to-order technology solutions tailored to an individual district’s educational goals. Dell incorporates a combination of managed services and a variety of products into its 1 to 1 offerings. The company believes that a successful 1 to 1 initiative goes far beyond a student and a notebook – it requires a total architecture solution in support of teaching and learning, including curriculum and content management, service and support, student portfolios, enterprise-wide access, and professional development.

Dell’s model recognizes that while the idea of putting a computing device into the hands of every student is often an objective, schools define and implement 1 to 1 in very different ways.  Dell supports 1 to 1 for teachers, for students, and for classrooms, using either a turnkey or customized solution, depending on the district’s needs. Dell encourages schools to consider the following questions before embarking on any 1:1 program:

  • What are the educational goals?
  • How will technology help you achieve those goals?
  • How will you measure the success of your program?
  • How will you sustain your initiative?
A complete 1 to 1 planning process examines the curriculum; how teachers and principals will employ devices; what technical support and services will be required; how robust and secure is the district infrastructure, etc.  Dell also believes that teachers should have access to and training on computing devices in advance of students. The teachers’ comfort level with technology is a key factor in technology adoption and utilization.Dell’s 1 to 1 solution provides strategies for:
  • Curriculum Integration
    • Using technology in curriculum and lesson plans
    • Software solutions to meet curriculum needs
    • Providing dynamic learning communities through education portals
  • Services and Support 
    • Infrastructure planning and project management services
    • Network management including wireless access and security for teacher and student work products
    • Implementation services including asset management, image development, deployment, break/fix, and help desk
    • Summertime refresh services for systems and recycling options
  • Professional development for IT specialists, teachers, students, and parents
    • Aimed at building capacity at the school level, solutions range from online content and lesson plan coaching to mentoring and workshops
    • Solutions for evaluating teacher technology and data usage
  • Computing Products, Peripherals, and Accessories
    • Helping school districts define and select the right device, from laptops to handhelds, to Dell Intelligent classroom devices such as interactive whiteboards, student response units, and probes
  • Sustainability
    • Funding strategies and options
    • Communication planning for community outreach
    • Defining service-level agreements and measurements for success

To assist in contributing to the growing body of research around 1 to 1 and educational computing, Dell is funding a research study in Henrico County Schools, Va., where Dell has a four-year contract to supply laptops to all high school students, teachers, and administrators. Dell is also funding research at Round Rock ISD in Texas, where students participate in Dell Intelligent Classroom environments. These studies examine both traditional 1 to 1 computing programs and differentiated 1 to 1 environments to determine the effects of these technology programs on teaching and learning.

Palm
http://www.palm.com/us/education/

In its 1 to 1 definition, Palm doesn’t envision its devices replacing laptops but forming part of the technology mix, due to their cost, ultimate mobility, and other attributes that schools have found useful and compelling for teaching and learning. In the company’s view, schools have different usage paradigms of computing devices, and 1 to 1 is one of those, but not the only one.

According to Eric Johnson, general manager of education for Palm, handhelds are a solution to the “appropriate technology for the appropriate use” – meaning there are ways that these devices can infuse the instructional process. Two examples, among many instructional uses, are as e-book readers or for listening to podcasts. Improvements in their processing power and functionality, wireless availability, and cost concerns have made handheld devices such as those of Palm much more widely used as personal devices for students. These issues include the following:

  • Networkability that supports student interaction in the classroom (e.g. connections such as Bluetooth allow kids to share data)
  • Ready broadband access to the Web for research and many other instructional uses
  • Students are familiar with small devices due to MP3 players and tiny gaming machines, etc.
  • They provide an easy way to perform tasks such as probes, calculations, and writing journals
  • Affordability: Johnson says there is a 6:1 ratio in equipping students with computing devices, when comparing handhelds to laptops. He maintains you can provide 6 students with a handheld device each at the price of one laptop. Palm devices come with some software such as school schedulers
  • Mobile device breakthroughs such as the LifeDrive: Instead of Flash or RAM-based memory such as other PDAs, this mobile manager has a 4-gigabyte hard drive. It has wireless support. Users can carry Word, Excel, and other docs from their desktop or laptop computers, in a secure environment.

One key change is that while Palm continues to promote various mobile-computing devices, it plans to focus much of its investment in smartphones, the company said. There are a plethora of devices that offer personal digital assistant features along with voice calling – and these devices are improving constantly. How much this plays out in the education market remains to be seen, but Palm is promoting these devices to administrators, such as the meeting of the Texas Computer Education Association in February.

Johnson also noted that the Palm TX is a good fit for schools implementing a mix of devices for a 1 to 1 program, with built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for networking and Web connections, larger screen, range of software, and price point of $299.

Devices: A Comparison of 1 to 1 Devices

This chart compares the functionality and features of various hardware devices in 1 to 1 computing.

LAPTOPS    
Overview Pros Cons

A laptop is a small portable computer, or notebook, generally weighing from 2 to 7 pounds. Laptops provide the full range of functionality of any computer. These devices are becoming the workhorses of many 1 to 1 programs, especially as prices have come down. Students are using them not only for writing, e-mail and other communications, researching on the Internet, and organizing assignments, but also for creating podcasts, editing digital images, and producing and presenting multimedia reports. Laptops typically are priced from $600 and up, though volume purchases, educational discounts, service packages, and software needs can radically alter the final costs.  

Speed and processing power compare favorably with desktops

Lightweight

Wireless capabilities

Good portability

Battery life on certain laptops has improved

Can easily be moved around classrooms and around schools

Allows easy collaboration and file sharing

Offers broad functionality for multimedia (e.g. music composition, movie production), spreadsheets, word docs, databases, and other educational uses

Relatively expensive when initial price point is compared with other hardware

The Total Cost of Ownership is still not well defined in K-12 schools, including maintenance and support costs, etc., and it appears to be high

Breakable, especially when dropped, though some are getting more durable

Depending on the model, some can be bulky for portable use

Battery life is often short on many laptops, especially for use during a school day

They sometimes walk

HANDHELDS    
Overview Pros Cons

Handhelds are portable, pocket-sized computing devices, ranging from personal digital assistants and MP3 players to smartphones and gaming devices. Students can use MP3 players to store data and smartphones to communicate and access the Web. Most commonly, handhelds used in schools are personal electronic devices such as Windows mobile PCs and Palms. Handheld devices for student use generally are priced in the range of $200 to $400, depending upon volume purchases, accompanying software, and external accessories, etc.

Ultimate mobility: can easily be carried in backpacks, etc.

Students are very used to these devices due to cell phones, MP3 players, and gaming

Wireless capabilities

Good bang for the buck: the capability level is approaching laptops

Digital books that can be read on handhelds have been improved

Allow easy collaboration and data sharing

Expands teacher-student interaction in creative ways

Generally longer battery life than laptops

Turn on instantly

Some limits in usage – doesn’t match the laptop when it comes to some sophisticated computing uses (e.g. multimedia)

Screen sizes can be problematic for uses such as video, though improvements and students’ familiarity with small screens are changing this 

Schools must analyze additional costs such as keyboards, other accessories, software, etc.

THIN CLIENTS    
Overview Pros Cons

Thin clients are computer “shells” in which the applications and storage reside on a server instead of on the local workstations. Some schools are choosing to leverage their older hardware and refurbish them for use as thin clients.  Applications and data are maintained centrally. Users turn them on as a “plug and go” device. Costs can vary widely depending upon the configuration and setup, but thin clients are in the range of $500 to $700 for initial purposes, and they have a long life cycle.

Can adapt old machines for use as thin clients

Do not have to replace hardware every 2-3 years; this can result in hardware savings though desktops have come down in price so much, the difference is not what it was

Can be administered completely from a central, remote place

Upgrades can be made simply

Schools and students can access applications from anywhere

Repair costs are usually, though not always, less

Thin-client environment offers good security

Machines can be locked down so that students cannot install software without permission

Thin clients don’t offer some functionality that you want, especially because you are dealing with what is on a central server

Not all software works on thin clients

Being able to get existing applications to work with thin clients can be complex and requires a high level of expertise


Back to top Back to top

STN Best Practices

BEST PRACTICES :

For best practices on 1 to 1 computing, Super Tech News is looking at two example school districts: Henrico County, Virginia, a large school system, and Guernsey-Sunrise Schools, Platte County, Wyoming, a smaller, rural district.

Henrico County Public Schools, one of the pioneers of 1 to 1, is in the fifth year of a program that provides a laptop to every middle school and high school student and teacher. Guernsey-Sunrise Schools gets to 1 to 1 through the use of a wide array of computing devices and connection setups, including desktops, laptops, handhelds, and thin clients.

These are two distinct approaches. Some schools believe that giving a laptop to each student best achieves the goal of 24/7 computing. Other schools, however, find that a mix of devices works better. It costs less than an all-laptop program and it’s flexible because particular devices work better for certain uses than others (e.g. handhelds are good for recording notes on a field trip or infrared beaming of data while laptops are good for creating multimedia projects).

In both of these models, the school systems are not simply providing devices to kids but are facilitating their use through Internet access, training, professional development, technical support, community outreach, and resources and tools.

Henrico County Public Schools, Virginia:
1 to 1 Computing With Laptops

Henrico County Public Schools Web site
http://www.henrico.k12.va.us/

Henrico County Public Schools, a large district with more than 47,000 students, is in the fifth year of a teaching and learning initiative that provides a laptop to every middle school and high school student. The district’s objective is to close the digital divide and demonstrate a paradigm for learning that is suitable to the 21st century. Henrico has teamed with Apple and Dell on lease programs for this initiative.

The key components of providing the devices and accompanying support for its 1 to 1 program are:

  • The school system has deployed approximately 24,000 laptops to all students in grades 6 through 12.
  • It has deployed approximately 5,000 laptops to the entire teaching and administrative staff.
  • Each elementary classroom has five iMacs for a total of 4,500 iMacs system-wide.
  • Each of the county’s nine high schools has at least two PC labs offering student access to approximately 1,200 PCs.
  • Schools contracted with a local service provider to offer low-cost Internet access for students and teachers who do not have access in their homes.
  • For middle school students, laptop batteries are programmed to last four to six hours. Students recharge their computers at home each night, and there are stations throughout the schools where students can recharge them during the day.
  • Henrico has also negotiated with Dell and Apple to provide full coverage for accidental damage.

Lloyd Brown, director of technology for Henrico County Public Schools, says that the district specifically told vendors that “we’d be looking for life in a book bag.” Basically, this meant that the computer program had to be structured to provide for full coverage that would stand up to the active lives of teens and pre-teens and that would give the students 24/7 access to laptops.

Apple was the sole vendor for the program for the first four-year phase of it, for both middle and high school. However, the district awarded Dell a contract in 2005 to supply laptops to high school students. Its programs for full coverage for damage, warranties, and loaner machines were instrumental to the decision, Brown says. And following this, Apple “stepped up to the plate,” adds Brown, with features and excellent coverage, too, as earlier this year it secured the middle school contract to lease its laptops for the coming four years.

As part of the 1 to 1 teaching and learning initiative, the school system has implemented a wide range of e-learning resources, content, and tools for teachers and students. These include: online diagnostics, online content, assessment tracking tools, interactive learning modules, server-based folder-sharing tools, interactive-game creators, graphic organizers, and many other tools and products.

Ongoing support is a key part of the program.  Before sixth grade pupils receive laptops, they are required to go through laptop training, which teaches them how to use, troubleshoot, and care for the computer.  Ongoing staff development is delivered through a variety of means, including a full-time trainer in each high school and middle school, student trainers, curriculum writing workshops, site-based institutes, and summer institutes. Technical trainers are at each secondary school to help teachers and students as they integrate technology into the curriculum. The trainers offer continuous staff development before school, after school, and during planning periods.

A major transformation was evident fairly quickly after the laptop initiative was started. School officials noticed how classes significantly moved from the traditional lecture model to a real constructivist type of learning through which students collaborate, solve problems, perform research, and construct knowledge. Students largely consider the laptops second nature to their schooldays now, as organizational and research tools and in performing their work.

In Brown’s view, the first four years of the program have allowed the district to work out the bugs. Now, the focus will be on intense evaluation of the real impact of 1 to 1 learning. To this end, Dell is funding a three-year study at Henrico County Public Schools, at a cost of $200,000, to determine the effects of giving a laptop to every student and teacher. The study, which is being performed by Interactive Inc., will help determine what impact computers are having upon learning and will document how and when the laptops are being used.

Guernsey-Sunrise Schools, Wyoming:
1 to 1 Computing With Multiple Devices

Guernsey-Sunrise Schools Web site
http://www.plt2.k12.wy.us/

Guernsey-Sunrise Schools in Wyoming has implemented a 1 to 1 program that supports students and that makes technology pervasive to the curriculum, according to Bruce Heimbuck, superintendent. The small rural district, with 250 students, in K-12, has made a concentrated effort to have technology immersed in every phrase of learning and for students to be able to access their work on computers through multiple ways.

Heimbuck says that Guernsey-Sunrise has moved over the last several years from a wired computing environment though an upgrade phase and now to a wireless environment. Its 1 to 1 anytime, anywhere computing initiative is executed using a wide variety of devices – including laptops, desktops, thin clients, and handhelds – and connection setups. These are the components, according to Heimbuck:

  • The district has 60 wireless laptops serving about 180 students. This brings it to a 3 to 1 arrangement, so it has created several other kinds of device-connection setups, as detailed below, that get it to 1 to 1 computing.
  • There are four mobile carts, two PC-based and two Mac-based. The labs are a crucial part of the mix, Heimbuck says. The carts are called COWs – Computers on Wheels, and CALFs – Computer Apples for Little Folks.
  • Guernsey-Sunrise has two Mac-based hard-wired labs, with about 50 Macs. It also has several mini-labs with a couple of computers apiece. These are used mainly for accelerated reading and math, small-group instruction, and students’ individual work.
  • Thin-client environments, two setups with 26 desktop computers, are set up to afford opportunities for students to move in and out of a computerized environment for their use – one a business lab and one in the student office. The use of the thin clients allows the district to leverage hardware and deliver and upgrade software from a central server.
  • The district also uses 40 handheld devices, which it checks out to students. The students were doing English journals on the handhelds, and then adapted them for many other uses, for work in other classes, as schedulers, and to beam notes to friends who had missed classes, says Heimbuck. They are also used by groups for networked discussion in classes and for science probes.

Heimbuck says that while teachers do not use the term “1 to 1,” he sees the system’s computing as 1 to 1 because “you have a machine when you need to do something wherever you are.” He believes that 1 to 1 is not so much providing a machine to a student as an environment in which students can save their work anywhere, access it from any other machine that's linked, choose multiple devices and ways to do their work, and have a server-based environment that supports pervasive technology in teaching and learning.

 

Back to top Back to top

Conferences

CONFERENCES:

Following is an annotated list of educational conferences that you may want to attend in the coming months (complete with links to information).

American Association of School Administrators: Stand Up For Public Education
This conference includes three days of briefings, receptions, and access to Congressional representatives. This initiative focuses on getting children ready for school, getting schools ready for children, and getting children ready for democracy.
May 9-11, 2006
Arlington, Va.
http://www.aasa.org/about/content.cfm?ItemNumber=2061&snItemNumber=2400

15th Annual edACCESS Conference
Through presentations, panels, roundtables, and focused discussion, this peer-centered conference is a resource for administrative computing personnel at secondary schools and small colleges. Keynote looks at the Web as a content platform for all ages.
June 19-22, 2006
Newport, R.I.
http://www.edaccess.org/conference.html

ED-MEDIA 2006
This multidisciplinary conference examines educational multimedia, hypermedia, and telecommunications and distance education. Bringing together the world of industry, practitioners, and researchers, it features keynotes, tutorials, demos, and discussions.
June 26-30, 2006
Orlando, Fla.
http://www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/default.htm

NECC 2006
The premier ed-tech conference provides state-of-the-art resources and solutions on current issues such as leadership, assessment, emerging technologies, online learning, and technology and accountability. Includes demos, roundtables, workshops, and student showcase.
July 5-7, 2006
San Diego, Calif.
http://center.uoregon.edu/ISTE/NECC2006/

Savvy Cyber Teacher Summer Institute
Hands-on professional development institute helps educators learn to create Internet-based resources to improve student learning in science, math, language arts, literacy, and other disciplines. Curriculum materials focus on real-time data and telecollaboration.
July 10-14, 2006, Grades 9-12; July 24-28, 2006, Grades K-5, 6-8
Hoboken, N.J.
http://www.savvycyberteacher.org/programs.html

American Association of School Administrators: Summer Leadership Conference
The Summer Leadership Institute is a high-level interactive discussion of relevant system-building issues such as value-added assessment. Among the key topics: working with the media and the public, professional career standard updates, a systemic approach to instructional leadership, and initiating and sustaining change.  
July 16-19, 2006
Keystone, Colo.
http://www.aasa.org/conferences/iMisEventDetail.cfm?ItemNumber=5649

Washington Interactive Technologies Conference
The 2006 gathering brings together pros from the education, industry, and government sectors to exchange information on technology-based learning systems, management systems, research, and applications. The Society for Applied Learning Technology’s conference explores new technologies as well as existing applications.
Aug. 23-25, 2006
Arlington, Va.
http://www.salt.org/salt.asp?pn=washington&ss=m

Back to top Back to top

 

* * *
SUBSCRIBE TO FUTURE ISSUES
If you would like to receive future issues of SuperTECH NEWS, click here to subscribe . If you would like us to send the newsletter to any of your colleagues, please let us know or feel free to forward this issue on.

Let us know if the SuperTECH NEWS newsletter is helpful to you and what you would like to read about in future newsletters. Let us know if there are good practices and people we should write about... Call us if you want to know more about the CIO-Time Share Service.

E-MAIL: eliot@blegroup.com
OR CALL: 202.281.1763

BLE GROUP
3936 Livingston Street, NW
Washington, DC 20015
202.281.1763 phone
202.363.9192 fax

www.blegroup.com

 

SUPERTECH NEWS © 2002-2005 BLE GROUP. All rights Reserved. Do not copy or reproduce without written permission.
NOTE: The BLE Group does not endorse any of the products mentioned in this newsletter.
These were selected to illustrate the types of products currently available.